Browsing by Author "Reddington, M."

Now showing items 1-4 of 4

Immediate patient perceptions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: semi-structured multi-centre interviews exploring the patient journey and experiences of lumbar fusion surgery (FuJourn).
Rushton, A. ; Elena, B. ; Jadhakhan, F. ; Masson, A. ; Staal, J.B. ; Verra, M.L. ; Emms, A. ; Reddington, M. ; Cole, A. ; Willems, P.C. ; Benneker, L. ; Heneghan, N.R. ; Soundy, A. et al. sine al.
2022, Article / Letter to editor (European Spine Journal, vol. 31, iss. 12, (2022), pp. 3590-3602)PURPOSE: To understand the patient journey to Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery (LSFS) and patients' experiences of surgery. METHODS: Qualitative study using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Adult participants following LSFS were recruited from 4 UK clinical sites using purposive sampling to ensure representation of key features (e.g. age). Semi-structured interviews informed by a piloted topic guide developed from the literature were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis for individual interviews and then across participants (deductive and inductive) identified emerging themes. Trustworthiness of data analyses was enhanced using multiple strategies (e.g. attention to negative cases). RESULTS: Four emerging themes from nn=n31 patients' narratives were identified: decision for surgery, coping strategies, barriers to recovery and recovery after surgery. Decision for surgery and recovery after surgery themes are distinguished by the point of surgery. However, barriers to recovery and coping strategies are key to the whole patient journey encompassing long journeys to surgery and their initial journey after surgery. The themes of coping strategies and barriers to recovery were inter-related and perceived by participants as parallel concepts. The 4 multifactorial themes interacted with each other and shaped the process of an individual patient's recovery. Factors such as sporadic interventions prior to surgery, time-consuming wait for diagnosis and surgery and lack of information regarding recovery strongly influenced perceptions of outcome. CONCLUSION: Patient driven data enables insights to inform research regarding surgery/rehabilitation through depth of understanding of the patient journey. Awareness of factors important to patients is important; ensuring that patient-driven data informs research and patient care.
Patient journey following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (FuJourn): A multicentre exploration of the immediate post-operative period using qualitative patient diaries.
Rushton, A. ; Jadhakhan, F. ; Masson, A. ; Athey, V. ; Staal, J.B. ; Verra, M.L. ; Emms, A. ; Reddington, M. ; Cole, A. ; Willems, P.C. ; Benneker, L. ; Heneghan, N.R. ; Soundy, A. et al. sine al.
2020, Article / Letter to editor (PLoS One, vol. 15, iss. 12, (2020), pp. e0241931)The aim of this study was to capture and understand the immediate recovery journey of patients following lumbar spinal fusion surgery and explore the interacting constructs that shape their journey. A qualitative study using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach. A purposive sample of 43 adult patients (≥16 years) undergoing ≤4 level instrumented fusion for back and/or leg pain of degenerative cause, were recruited pre-surgery from 4 UK spinal surgery centres. Patients completed a weekly diary expressed in their own words for the first 4 weeks following surgery to capture their life as lived. Diary content was based on previous research findings and recorded progress, recovery, motivation, symptoms, medications, healthcare appointments, rehabilitation, positive/negative thoughts, and significant moments; comparing to the previous week. To maximise completion and data quality, diaries could be completed in paper form, word document, as online survey or as audio recording. Strategies to enhance diary adherence included a weekly prompt. A framework analysis for individual diaries and then across participants (deductive and inductive components) captured emergent themes. Trustworthiness was enhanced by strategies including reflexivity, attention to negative cases and use of critical co-investigators. Twenty-eight participants (15 female; n = 18 (64.3%) aged 45-64) contributed weekly diaries (12 withdrew post-surgery, 3 did not follow through with surgery). Adherence with diaries was 89.8%. Participants provided diverse and vivid descriptions of recovery experiences. Three distinct recovery trajectories were identified: meaningful recovery (engagement in physical and functional activities to return to functionality/mobility); progressive recovery (small but meaningful improvement in physical ability with increasing confidence); and disruptive recovery (limited purpose for meaningful recovery). Important interacting constructs shaped participants' recovery including their pain experience and self-efficacy. This is the first account of immediate recovery trajectories from patients' perspectives. Recognition of a patient's trajectory may inform patient-centred recovery, follow-up and rehabilitation to improve patient outcomes.
Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study.
Rushton, A.B. ; Verra, M.L. ; Emms, A. ; Heneghan, N.R. ; Falla, D. ; Reddington, M. ; Cole, A.A. ; Willems, P. ; Benneker, L. ; Selvey, D. ; Hutton, M. ; Heymans, M.W. ; Staal, J.B. et al. sine al.
2018, Article / Letter to editor (BMJ Open, vol. 8, iss. 5, (2018))
Patient journey following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS): protocol for a multicentre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (FuJourn).
Rushton, A. ; Staal, J.B. ; Verra, M. ; Emms, A. ; Reddington, M. ; Soundy, A. ; Cole, A. ; Willems, P. ; Benneker, L. ; Masson, A. ; Heneghan, N.R. et al. sine al.
2018, Article / Letter to editor (BMJ Open, vol. 8, iss. 1, (2018))

Now showing items 1-4 of 4

Browsing by Author "Reddington, M."

Browse

All of HAN Publications