Title: | Effect evaluation of a self-management programme for employees with complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder: a randomised controlled trial. |
Author(s): | Hutting, N. ; Staal, J.B. ; Engels, J.A. ; Heerkens, Y.F. ; Detaille, S.I. ; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G. |
Publication year: | 2015 |
Source: | Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 72, iss. 12, (2015), pp. 852-861 |
ISSN: | 1351-0711 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103089 |
Annotation: | 1 december 2015 |
Publication type: | Article / Letter to editor |
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12470/2255 ![]() |
|
Display more details |
|
Lectorate : | Arbeid en Gezondheid Arbeidsdeskundigheid Werkzame Factoren in Fysiotherapie en Paramedisch Handelen Human Resource Management |
Journal title : | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
Volume : | vol. 72 |
Issue : | iss. 12 |
Page start : | p.852 |
Page end : | p.861 |
Abstract: |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a self-management intervention (including an eHealth module), compared with usual care, in employees with chronic non-specific complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (persisting >3 months). METHODS: Participants were randomised into the self-management group (SG) or usual care group (UCG). The SG participated in 6 self-management sessions and could use an eHealth module; the UCG could use all available usual care. The primary outcome of the study was score on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Secondary outcomes included: absenteeism, pain in the previous week, quality of life, pain catastrophising, self-efficacy, work style, presenteeism, fatigue, and limitations experienced during work. Data were analysed using generalised estimating equations (GEE) linear regression and Mann-Whitney U tests, and were collected at baseline, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: On the general module of the DASH, no significant difference between SG and the UCG was detected. On most of the other outcome measures, there were no significant between-group differences. In the DASH work module, the between-group effect was -3.82 (95% CI -7.46 to -0.19, p=0.04). For limitations experienced in job-related activities the between-group effect was -1.01 (95% CI -1.97 to -0.04, p=0.04). The mean hours of sport activities in the past 3 months, measured at 12 months, was 1.00 h (95% CI -1.90 to -0.12 h, p=0.03) less in the SG compared with the UCG. CONCLUSIONS: The self-management intervention improved the participants' perceived disability during work. Since no significant between-group differences were found on most outcome measures, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Registration number NTR 3816.
|